Conference on DNA Computing Liveblog 2

Please excuse any typographical issues as this is going up right after lunch. I’ll proofread and remove this message later.

The morning session was mostly computational/simulation studies. Ibáňez talked about threshold networks and how they can be used to simulate complex reactions and biological regulation.

Hajiaghayi and Doty talked about stochastic and differential equation based simulators. The limitations of using a formal language to describe reactions and reaction networks are that it makes assumptions about concentrations and that it is limited to rather small numbers of molecules. The advantage is that the reaction (number of molecules of each chemical species) can be highly precisely defined in time. I have always taken an ODE approach; the stochastic nature of this approach makes me nervous. Both approaches are reasonable and highlight a fundamental, interesting distinction that all nano-scientists need to make: deal with such large numbers of molecules that you can treat them as a fungible quantity, or deal with small numbers of molecules on a discrete basis.

Continue reading

Conference on DNA Computing Liveblog 1

Today is day one of the International Conference on DNA Computing and Molecular Programming (DNA19). The first day is a “tutorial session” which is a conference feature that new to me. I like the idea, though: catch everyone up and get on the same page for the rest of the conference. The sessions were oriented to reviews of the field and introductions to new tools. Prof. Kurt Gothelf discussed primarily structure. Most of this is fairly familiar to me: DNA has been used to build increasingly complex physical and computational designs over the last 10-15 years.

DNA origami was very popular in the scientific media for a while. It has expanded into moving/actuated structures and 3 dimensions. It is starting to go from intellectual curiosity to functional nano-objects. I’m confident we’ll talk more about the functions of these constructs this week, but for today it was essentially a single slide about nanopores.

Continue reading

Globalization and Why Generation Y is Unhappy

This is a cross post from my other blog, Student Pro Tips

This is about saving money.

The Boomers had it uniquely good. If you worked in the United States from 1950 to 1980, you made especially good money. If you invested, you got especially good returns. This convinced people that working and saving at a modest rate was all it takes to have a comfortably affluent life.

Continue reading

Comments on: Apocalyptic thinking is self-flattery

I read an essay in the Chronicle about apocalyptic thinking that solidified some ideas that I have been unable to organize in my mind. The gist is that Apocalyptic thinking is really just egotism. For example, take when Harold Camping predicted the world would end. That was more narcissistic than anything else. I feel some tension when I make that judgment: although I laugh at his conceit, I still love dystopian fiction. That makes me a little narcissistic, too.

Continue reading

Recent Books and Competing Visions for the Future

Several months ago, I said I was starting in on Ray Kurzweil’s new book (How to Create a Mind). I had many deadlines and needed something motivational (I still have many deadlines and would like another motivational book, actually). I read it and I enjoyed it. Kurzweil is a leader in the AI field but more of a technology cheerleader outside of that field. For my purposes, that is fine. I just need some Grand Vision sometimes.

Continue reading